Is the NFL going to go the same way? Interesting idea.

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017, 15:11 Ralph Stuart <rstuartcih**At_Symbol_Here**me.com> wrote:

An interesting piece about the limits of PPE can be found at
https://www.safetyrisk.net/banning-head-protection-is-safer/

Banning Head Protection is Safer Some may be aware that the National Boxing Championships are being conducted in Adelaide in April 2017. This is the first championship where protective headgear has been banned. This is in line with a global ban on protective headgear because it doesn't protect heads
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2293803/Headgear-boxers-banned-bid-REDUCE-head-injuries.html

New rules by the International Boxing Association (AIBA) has banned head gear because it causes harm. The ban applies from June 2017 in a bid to reduce head injuries. It turns out that protective gear is not protective, because of how it affects the thinking of those participating in the sport. Headgear changes the mindset of participants and research has shown that a lack of headgear actually reduces the risk of concussion. The AIBA announcement comes after new research published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine found there was =91no good evidence that mouthguards and helmets ward off concussion'.

- Ralph



Ralph Stuart, CIH
rstuartcih**At_Symbol_Here**me.com

---
This e-mail is from DCHAS-L, the e-mail list of the ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety.
For more information about the list, contact the Divisional secretary at secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org

--

Sent from Neal Langerman's Nexus

--- This e-mail is from DCHAS-L, the e-mail list of the ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety. For more information about the list, contact the Divisional secretary at secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post