From: Lawrence M Gibbs <lgibbs**At_Symbol_Here**STANFORD.EDU>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [DCHAS-L] Formic acid
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 20:15:36 +0000
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Message-ID: 1573C3AD-1D7C-4C5C-924A-C7F7861A0736**At_Symbol_Here**stanford.edu
In-Reply-To


These are relative statements made based on standardized toxicity testing. A reasonable reference for for if acid would be the National Toxicological Program report on Formic acid evaluation. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/st_rpts/tox019.pdf

Need to recall that all thing are toxic depending on the dose. 

Larry

On Apr 6, 2017, at 12:40 PM, Ferm, Barret <000003e16e810599-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU> wrote:


Is it just me, or is the following entry in the Wikipedia entry on formic acid misleading, or even deceptive?

"Safety

Formic acid has low toxicity [emphsis added] (hence its use as a food additive), with an LD50 of 1.8 g/kg (oral, mice). The concentrated acid is corrosive to the skin.[6]"

Farther below in the same section, however, it says the OSHA PEL is 30 ppm. Elsewhere it gives the NFPA hazard codes: H=3, F=2, R=1. 

How can they say it is "low toxicity"?

~Barry Ferm 

Chemical Hygiene Officer
Chemistry Laboratory Coordinator

--- This e-mail is from DCHAS-L, the e-mail list of the ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety. For more information about the list, contact the Divisional secretary at secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.