| About This Archive | | DCHAS-L 2015 Index | | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | |
Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.
|
Previous by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Just published Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 7:13:56 PM Author: Bruce Van Scoy <bvanscoy**At_Symbol_Here**TWC.COM> |
Next by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Follow-up on ACS national awards and Fellows program RE: [DCHAS-L] Just published Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 23:11:42 -0500 Author: Jim Kaufman |
Dear CHAS colleagues,
Our current national awards nominations process uses the following statement: "To the best of my knowledge, the nominee employs and requires good safety protocols and practices in his/her laboratory." The nominator must select "yes", "no" or "Unknown".
At our meeting this week, the ACS Board began the process of adding safety to the ACS Fellows criteria, and adding clauses to the ACS national awards and Fellows program that allows ACS to revoke an award or Fellows designation. I expect that these provisions will be put in place shortly.
Best regards,
Diane
Diane G. Schmidt
ACS President
Thanks Neal!
I his AAAS Fellowship should absolutely be revoked. But, I continue to question, what was she trained in, to what standards and what were our responsibilities to see that she was adequately protected? Dr. Harran was receiving the award based upon "The association bestows this honorary title on members "whose efforts on behalf of the advancement of science or its applications are scientifically or socially distinguished," according to the AAAS website. Nominated by people in their own disciplines, 347 fellows were chosen this year." Upholding safety principals is not mentioned, I hypothesize that the very fact he was nominated by peers from his profession, is an indicator of how far we still have yet to travel with our responsibilities to ensure they are fully informed and accountable. We've come a long way, but serious laboratory accidents continue to occur. Maybe a correct analogy is to consider we may be 20' up on a 40' ladder and still have a long way to go. Are our efforts being successful? If not, why not? Finally, how can we expedite the process to achieve higher impact/results? I have asked a lot of questions, that we will probably never obtain specific answers to. But shouldn't we be asking these questions?
BruceV
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**med.cornell.edu]
On Behalf Of NEAL LANGERMAN
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 2:14 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Just published
The following was just published … on the AAAS story
Neal
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
ACSafety has a new address:
NEAL LANGERMAN, Ph.D.
ADVANCED CHEMICAL SAFETY, Inc.
PO Box 152329
SAN DIEGO CA 92195
011(619) 990-4908 (phone, 24/7)
We no longer support FAX.
Please contact me before sending any packages or courier delivery. The address for those items is:
5340 Caminito Cachorro
San Diego CA 92105
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post