So the discussion in the UC Lab Safety world now includes flame retardant lab coats and human/environmental potential consequences.
I would greatly appreciate being pointed toward information that would help us more intelligently discuss these concerns:
How good are FR coats in a real flammable liquid fire? How does that compare to non-FR lab coats?
Are the treated cloth lab coats inferior to the "Nomex" type?
Do the modern treated FR coats demonstrate any human toxicity or environmental adverse effects?
Literature that may help us in answering these kinds of questions is what I am asking you to help me find.
Sincerely,
-Russ
Russell Vernon, Ph.D.
Director
Environmental Health & Safety
University of California Riverside
900 University Ave
EH&S
Riverside, CA 92521
www.ehs.ucr.edu
russell.vernon**At_Symbol_Here**ucr.edu
direct 951.827.5119
admin 951.827.5528
fax 951.827.5122
after hours emergency contact UCPD 951.827.5222
________________________________________
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] on behalf of Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety [secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:50 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines from Google (12 articles)
From: Melissa Charlton-Smith
Nitric acid is aqueous, so how can it be flammable (in the Tripoli story)
Possibly someone who KNOWS told the reporter that it's an oxidizer and at
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post
Subject: RE: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines from Google (12 articles)
Date: January 25, 2013 1:33:49 PM EST
certain concentrations can cause combustion in contact with combustible
materials....and the reporter took the short root to "it's flammable".