| About This Archive | | DCHAS-L 2012 Index | | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | |
Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.
|
Previous by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Handling O2 and H2 Date: October 18, 2012 9:06:23 AM EDT Author: Daniel Crowl |
Next by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Handling O2 and H2 Date: October 18, 2012 2:34:11 PM EDT Author: Des Richardson |
Yes, good point Neal. Sometimes ago, we bought a hydrogen gas generating instruments using electrolysis of water to provide H2 for our GCs. It works well, but needs to be maintained.
Mikhail
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Neal Langerman
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 7:54 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Handling O2 and H2
Labs tend to have cylinders of H2 and O2 which pose risks that can be easily mitigated by reducing the quantity of gas. For the researcher, all that is needed is a reliable gas source of sufficient volume and pressure to do the job. For the risk managers, the issue adds reducing the risk along with meeting the research needs. One proven way to do this is to generate O2 and/or H2 locally via the electrolysis of water.
I am looking at a resource that will deliver either or both gases at a pressure of about 1500 psi (100 bar) and a volume of 1 liter per minute (that is a lot!).
It is locally generated and a simple power interruption removes the hazards associated with each gas.
So, my questions to the list are simple -
Is this of interest to you?
Is $25k USD reasonable to replace all of the H2 (or O2) cylinders in the chemistry department?
The big downside of this is having a single source within a department. Major research departments will likely want several. A look at the demurrage costs of cylinders will easily make the $25k ( and low annual maintenance) seem reasonable.
I look forward to your comments and questions…
Incidentally, I do not have any financial involvement with the above; it was presented to me as a solution to a problem I have worked on for years – too damn many cylinders in labs….
Neal
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
ACSafety has a new address:
NEAL LANGERMAN, Ph.D.
ADVANCED CHEMICAL SAFETY, Inc.
PO Box 152329
SAN DIEGO CA 92195
011(619) 990-4908 (phone, 24/7)
We no longer support FAX.
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post