Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:56:22 -0500
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**med.cornell.edu>
From: Mary Ellen A Scott <mas35**At_Symbol_Here**CASE.EDU>
Subject: Re: Fume Hood
X-To: DCHAS-L
In-Reply-To: <1322838973.31377.YahooMailNeo**At_Symbol_Here**web39407.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
--20cf307f3b5e3f84b404b31ed933
 
I need to quote chapter and verse ... would you have the ANSI reference?
and I am so glad to have this information

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Chuck koch  wrote:

Shouldn't use the fume hood unless it has the utility panel.   ANSI
standard.
Chuck Koch, CIH, MPH
Foothills Environmental Inc.
303 905 2371

 ------------------------------
*From:* Mary Ellen A Scott 
*To:* DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
*Sent:* Friday, December 2, 2011 5:02 AM
*Subject:* Re: [DCHAS-L] Fume Hood

The utility panel(s) are located inside the workplace along both sides of
the hood and are used to access the plumbing for the water, air and gas
outlets which are located next to the panel (s).

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Michael E. Richardson <
mrichardson**At_Symbol_Here**flowsciences.com> wrote:

Mary Ellen:****
 What part of the fume hood are you referring to when you say =93utility
panel=94? If you are talking about the back where the small openings are
inside the work area, then yes you are absolutely right. I know this as the
baffle (or with our enclosures the plenum). It is specifically designed for
best air flow with this in place. ****
** **
V/R,****
Mike****
 ------------------------------
*From:* DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] *On
Behalf Of *Mary Ellen A Scott
*Sent:* Thursday, December 01, 2011 10:30 AM
*To:* DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
*Subject:* [DCHAS-L] Fume Hood****
** **
Hello Everyone,

When the utility panel on a chemical fume hood is missing is it safe to
allow work to be preformed in the hood?

I would say work (synthesis, toxic gas use and powder decanting) should
not be preformed until the panel be replaced for the following reasons:

1. Eddyies in the hood are likely to be form which may cause loss of
containment.
2. Chemicals vapors are going into areas where they are not suppose go and
may cause deterioration of the plumbing and joints
3. High Performance and Low flow hoods would be especially vulnerable to
the loss of work space integrity.

Would anyone have a policy on hood repairs like the above or comments?
As always, thank you for your thoughts in advance.

Mary Ellen

****

--
Mary Ellen Scott, PhD.
Safety Specialist II
Case Western Reserve University
EHS - Environmental Health and Safety
Service Building 1st Floor Rm 113
2220 Circle Dr.
Cleveland, OH 44106-7227
216-368-6077
216-368-2236 (Fax)
maryellen.scott**At_Symbol_Here**case.edu
*=93There is no science without fancy and no art without fact=94 =96 Vladimir
Nabokov* (1899-1977)


-- 
Mary Ellen Scott, PhD.
Safety Specialist II
Case Western Reserve University
EHS - Environmental Health and Safety
Service Building 1st Floor Rm 113
2220 Circle Dr.
Cleveland, OH 44106-7227
216-368-6077
216-368-2236 (Fax)
maryellen.scott**At_Symbol_Here**case.edu
*=93There is no science without fancy and no art without fact=94 =96 Vladimir
Nabokov* (1899-1977)

--20cf307f3b5e3f84b404b31ed933
 
I need to quote chapter and verse ... would you have the ANSI reference?
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Chuck koch <cihchuck**At_Symbol_Here**yahoo.com> wrote:
Shouldn't use the fume hood unless it has the utility panel. ANSIstandard.


Chuck Koch, CIH, MPH
Foothills Environmental Inc.


From: Mary Ellen A Scott <mas35**At_Symbol_Here**CASE.EDU To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2011 5:02 AM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Fume Hood

The utility panel(s) are located inside the workplace along both sidesof the hood and are used to access the plumbing for the water, air and gasoutlets which are located next to the panel (s).

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Michael E. Richardson <mrichardson**At_Symbol_Here**flowsciences.com> wrote:
Mary Ellen:
What part of the fume hood are you referring to when you say =93utility panel=94? If you are talking about the back where the small openings are inside the work area, then yes you are absolutely right. I know this as the baffle (or with our enclosures the plenum). It is specifically designed for best air flow with this in place.
V/R,
Mike

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen A Scott
Sent: Thursday, December 01,2011 10:30 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Fume Hood
Hello Everyone,

When the utility panel on a chemical fume hood is missing is it safe to allow work to be preformed in the hood?

I would say work (synthesis, toxic gas use and powder decanting) should notbe preformed until the panel be replaced for the following reasons:

1. Eddyies in the hood are likely to be form which may cause loss of containment.
2. Chemicals vapors are going into areas where they are not suppose go and may cause deterioration of the plumbing and joints
3. High Performance and Low flow hoods would be especially vulnerable to the loss of work space integrity.

Would anyone have a policy on hood repairs like the above or comments?
As always, thank you for your thoughts in advance.

Mary Ellen




--
Mary Ellen Scott, PhD.
Safety Specialist II
Case Western Reserve University
EHS - Environmental Health and Safety
Service Building 1st Floor Rm 113
2220 Circle Dr.
Cleveland, OH 44106-7227
216-368-6077
216-368-2236 (Fax)
maryellen.scott**At_Symbol_Here**case.edu
=93There is no science without fancy and no art without fact=94 =96 Vladimir Nabokov (1899-1977)







--
Mary Ellen Scott, PhD.
Safety Specialist II
Case Western Reserve University
EHS - Environmental Health and Safety
Service Building 1st Floor Rm 113
2220 Circle Dr.
Cleveland, OH 44106-7227
216-368-6077
216-368-2236 (Fax)
maryellen.scott**At_Symbol_Here**case.edu
=93There is no science without fancy and no art without fact=94 =96 Vladimir Nabokov (1899-1977)


--20cf307f3b5e3f84b404b31ed933--

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.